Wednesday, July 13, 2005

A strange coincidence, and coming out in the open

Huh, I started thinking about this earlier today and I realized, I wrote this letter to Kim DuToit a year ago almost to the day:

I was just fired a few minutes ago. Officially I was “terminated without cause”, and that for future employment inquiries they will report that I “decided to leave”. Unofficially I learned that the decision had been made by “senior management” to fire me about three months ago, but that they had kept me on to finish up my projects.

Coincidentally, about three months ago I was at a social function with my boss’s boss when he took me aside and said to me “Is that a gun?”—I was, as usual, carrying my Kahr K9, and he had seen the gun under my shirt—“Would you mind taking that out to your car? I really don’t like guns and I don’t think it’s appropriate for you to have one here”.

I said “Sure, no problem, but let me just say this...”, then I explained to him that I was carrying a weapon legally, that I never carried while at work or with clients, that this was not a work function, but that even if it was the company had no firearms policy which they should if they want to restrict gun possession around the company. I told him that I always carried outside of work when it was legal for me to do so, but that I had no problem taking my gun back to the car if it made him more comfortable.

The next week a new supplement was issued to our employee handbook that prohibited possession of all firearms at company facilities, offices, events, functions, company-related functions or events, company-sponsored functions or events, or any organized gathering of employees, clients, customer business partners or vendors.

It also made very clear that any violation of this policy would result in immediate termination.

Well when I received this I politely refused to sign it as it violated several state and Federal laws (right to privacy, right to freely associate etc...). I told my boss this, and the head of HR, and I suggested what needed to be changed to be legal. I also informed them that pursuant to state law if they wanted to ban firearms from the building they had to post a sign at all entrances saying such. All of this was offered to be helpful, not in any way adversarial. I have no problem complying with a company policy as long as it’s legal. The policy had apparently been dashed off boilerplate and hadn’t been vetted by the lawyers. They issued a new policy the next week which was worded differently and didn’t try and restrict out-of-work functions as much, but was still pretty restrictive. Unfortunately I can’t share it with you due to a non-disclosure agreement, but even with the new language I doubt if it would stand up in court, but I just didn’t want to fight it any more. They still haven’t put up the signs.

A few days later my boss told me on the sly that his boss was looking for a reason to fire me. He also let me know that his boss was going to make him give me a poor performance review; his quote “I hate to do this, but there’s nothing I can do, and you need to start watching your back a bit more”. Finally I was reprimanded for my “unprofessional behavior” in carrying a gun around my co-workers.

Please don’t misunderstand me, my boss is great. He’s been behind me 100%, very supportive, and really one of the best bosses I’ve ever had, but when the Number Two guy in the company decides you have to go, that’s just the way it is.

So anyway a few weeks ago my major project ended, but I was already booked in on two more projects. Well let me just say I aced them. The sales guys for both projects, and the customers raved. My boss gave me some really positive feedback and we talked about the great opportunities I had just created with the two previously very difficult clients. Then he told me that he had to give me an official warning for poor performance because I had been lax in some of my paperwork, and that I had taken too much comp time for all of the uncompensated mandatory overtime I was doing. We talked about how this was going to affect my bonus, and what we could do to improve things in the future.

That was a week ago. Today at 3pm we reviewed the projects again in preparation for wrap-up meetings. Again I got some great feedback on my performance and for creating these great new opportunities, and then my boss’s boss came in and said “I’m sorry, we’re going to have to let you go”.

He in fact wanted to have me escorted off the premises immediately. He actually looked frightened of me and left the room quickly. My boss said he would stay with me while I copied my personal files and cleaned out my stuff. We talked for a good hour about what had happened. He confessed to me, again off the record, unofficial etc… that his boss has been afraid of me for months, and when the decision had been made etc… He said that his boss was honestly afraid I would pull out a gun and shoot him.

At this point I was understandably not happy, but I was pretty calm. My boss apologized for the bullshit, and said that he felt like he had let me down.

So basically I was fired for being a gun enthusiast employed by a GFW.

I think I’ll be spending a lot of time at the range this weekend.
That was on July 15th 2004; now one year later, if not to the day, to the week... Weird huh. At the time I asked Kim not to reveal who I was, but I feel fine in coming forward now to say it was me.

That is twice I was fired for my political views and actions in 12 months.

Leadership

The biggest thing missing from the debate last year about presidential candidates was an asessment of their leadership skills, and natural abilities.

Now we are all talking about 2008, and there doesn't seem to be anyone really generating any real interest.

Sure character, intelligence, integrity, and honor are critically important (and Kerry failed on all but one), but none of them tell you much about a persons ability to lead.

Some folks are just natural leaders. People will follow them, and not know why. Natural leaders tend to generate intense passion and loyalty in their supporters, and intense hatred in their opponents.

Some others aren’t actually great natural leaders, but sociopaths who project leadership, which some are duped by, and then use that projection to manipulate the dupes. This is known as the “cult of personality” effect and can be illustrated in cult leaders and politicians like Bill Clinton, Fidel Castro, Hitler, Stalin etc…

There are people who are good leaders solely out of competence. They are just the best person for the job at the time.

Finally there are those who, whatever else they have or don't have; are good leaders because they have overwhelming character, resolve, and purpose. They are on a mission from god, or a holy quest, or a personal crusade and they are gonna take you with them.

To be truly great (or truly monstrous), you need to have at least two of these things behind you. We haven't had a president like that in a loooong time. Maybe Roosevelt, maybe not. Honestly since Lincoln I dont think there’s been a truly great leader as president, only some near greats.

Look at the last 50 or so years:

Bush has some natural leadership ability, but not much skill, and it’s stymied by his other faults.

Cinton was a sociopath plain and simple.

Bush senior was a good administrator, and competent, but not much of a leader.

Reagan was a natural leader, and had great moral character, but he wasnt quite there. Maybe as a younger man he would have been truly great as a natural leader.

Carter, a genius but he had no bottom and almost no natural leadership.

Ford, a joke. A scrub president selected because everyone thought he was too nice and too dumb to lie.

Nixon, a paranoid sociopath.

LBJ, a consumate politican, but no leadership ability at all. He was a great schemer, a great manipulator, a very intelligent man, but not a leader.

The best natural leader we’ve had in the White House in the last 50 years was clearly JFK. Sure the man had a hell of a lot of faults, but he inspired people to follow him. People still have an amazing passionate loyalty and affection for him today (of course this has MANY reasons, most of which are more myth than reality, but still). Unfortunately he had little else going for him. He wasn't very smart, or very competent, and he didnt have a great cause, other than his truly great love for America (which shouldn't be underestimated, but isn't enough for a successful presidency). Basically if he hadnt been shot he would have been well loved, but not done very much.

You would think Eisenhower was a great leader, but actually his subordinates didn't like him very much. What he was was a brilliant delegator, a solid desicison maker, and very good at bringing different elements of his commands together. Of course it was his brilliant delegation that brought us Fidel Castro, the Bay of Pigs, The Cuban Missle crisis, the Viet Nam war etc…

Everyone hated Truman as a boss. He was a nasty bastard, but he was good at his job, and he made tough decisions and mostly stuck to them. He was a very good postwar president, and a good practical leader, but not a natural leader.

You have to go back to Roosevelt before you get a truly great leader, and even then the guy started some things in America that may eventually end in our downfall so I’m not sure if he qualifies.

Of all the possible presidential candidates out there, with any chance in hell of being NOMINATED never mind elected; I can only think of three that I can picture voting for: Ron Paul, George Allen, and Condaleeza Rice.

Honeslty people, I'm not seeing the leadership there either...

So as I’ve asked all too many times before, who and where are our great leaders? I don’t see any coming up right now, and we’re gonna need’em real frikken soon.

Tuesday, July 12, 2005

Well, I Honestly Can't Deny It...

http://www.space.net.au/~dpwyrm/interactive/kooks/kook.html

Kook report: 73

You are undoubtedly odd. You worry your family, and you no longer have any normal friends. When you go on holiday, you chose places like Transylvania, the Sonora desert, McMurdo Sound and the Amazonian rain-forest. You mutter and mumble to yourself in times of stress, and you try not to open your wardrobe too often, in case something comes through...


Actually I rather think McMurdo would kick ass. I have a friend who went on an Antarctic Cruise, and I would have loved that.

There is no spoon folks.

I'm not an addict...

JRonus: Can anyone give any insight on .44 magnums? I want it primarily for target shooting and occasional hunting.
Thanks

Toad: Well I don’t have any recent experience so I’m not going to be any help (I prefer automatics and I’m a recoil wuss). But for an adjustable sight double action pistol on the basis of purty I like the Colt Anaconda. Here is a used one from GusAmerica. I’m kind of curious now myself about what the revolver fans like?

http://www.gunsamerica.com/guns/976577363.htm
I tried out the Anaconda, and honestly I didnt care for it. It never seemed to me to be up to the (admintedly very high) standard of the python, and it jsut didnt feel as god as a Model 29.

If I could afford one, I’d have a Dan Wesson, AND a model 29 sitting in my range bag. Unfortunately I can’t; for one thing, neither of the originals are made anymore, and the owners dont really like to sell them for less than a small fortune.

For me, the 629 just doesnt feel the same… and really it isnt, because they are made very differently; from different steel.. but maybe it’s close enough. Dan Wesson may be making the .44’s again (I heard maybe yes, maybe no. now with the CZ thing, who knows), but not to anywhere near the same standard they had in the 70s…

See heres the thing, I want DA revolvers in .357, .44, and .45lc ... plus .454 casull… and maybe one of the little tiny titanium/scandium .357 for pants pocket stuff (almsot as small as a KelTec, a little thicker, and 4 times the power… yeah I’ll take that).

So the .44 is way down the list, which is too bad.

Oh and I need to buy a replacement SIG and Glock first (I sold mine to Dustin), then maybe add a P220 (you can never have too many .45s...) hell, a model 10 or a model 25 wouldnt be out of the question either (again, you can never have too many .45s), one of those mech-tech carbine conversions… and maybe a S&W-1911sc (commander length, scandium frame, 28oz, external extractor, perfect trigger… yeah, I need one of those)....


Oh and a heavy barrel 24" upper for my AR... and... and...

Yeah, I’m not an addict; addicts go to meetings.

Burning The Flag

Alright, I havent said anything about this because I wanted to let the fervor die down for a bit.

If you are an American citizen, burning the flag (unless properly disposing of one) is wrong. It is intended as, and recieved as; a gesture of disrespect for the service that millions have provided to this country. The burning of an American flag by an American citizen is an act of dishonor equivalent to the denunciation of your citizenship; and should cary a social stigma equivalent to it. It is a direct insult to those freedoms which allow you to burn the flag in the first place

And that's the thing, you DO have that freedom, and you should.

The most dangerous words in the English language are "There ought to be a law"...

No, there ought to be some courtesy and civility; there ought to be some decency; there ought to be some respect; but we don't need a law to prohibit burning the flag.

We don't need to write laws to ensure civil behavior, and we shouldn't. You cannot write laws to make everyone behave honorably, because there is no honor in "not breaking the law"... if one has to write laws enforcing honor, then honor has no meaning.

We most certainly do not need to alter our constitution, to prohibit a class of distatasteful expression.

We don't need a law for this, we need a society where people actually understand what the flag represents. Because I tell you right now, those people who burn the flag certainly do not. They have no real understanding of what they are doing, it's just a symbol to them, and NOT the same symbol it is to you and me. It's a political tool and nothing more.

To them, the flag has no real meaning or message.

To me, it's a different story. When I see the american flag, I cannot help but straighten up; and I unconsciously want to salute. When I see the flag, I think of the blood, sweat, and tears that went into making those colors mean something.

A flag is nothing, it is just a symbol, a piece of cloth; and if you dont understand what it means; if you don't believe in what that symbol represents; you have destroyed nothing...

It;s what is represented by that symbol that is important; and you haven't destroyed that by burning the symbol...

But you HAVE made a lot of people angry, and they are mostly the type of people you really don't want to make angry.

Now I don't think we need an amendment to protect the flag... but I well and truly believe that burning the flag should automatically be considered "Fighting Words", for the purpose of a justification defense.

No, you wont get off, but it will just be misdemeanor simple assault, with a light sentence.

So go ahead, burn the flag, but if you try and do it anywhere near me, I'm going to take extreme exception. Hell, I live in the real America, what jury is going to convict me for shoving that pole right up your ass.

Monday, July 11, 2005

Next Mom update

Well, she had a series of seizures last night and today. Shes had a hell of a lot of tests, and she says they are going to have some solid info for her tomorrow.

Thankfully these ones were far more mild than the previous ones. She doesnt appear to have any additional memory loss or disorientation.

... You know its funny, my mom is so hard to deal with on her medical care..

See the problem is that she is unable to give up control over any bit of her life. She has always had control issues, and her illnesses have just made them worse.

She's the type of person who will deliberately do something that she knows will hurt her.. like take all ehr medications and flush them down the toilet... to maintain the illusion of control, rather than admit she is helpless before the illness, and let the doctors make decisions for her.

Pride is important; without pride what are you; but theres a point where pride must be set aside, and survival must take priority. I can understand not wanting to live with the indignities and pain of a crippling illness, but that's not what we are talking about here. This is lying to doctors, and not following medical instructions, jsut so she can feel like shes in control of her own life; even though by doing so she makes herself worse, which actually REDUCES the control she has over her life.

For some time now it has been clear that my mother needs to assign durable power of attorney to me, or at the very least a medical power of attorney; because there are long periods of time where she is incapable of making decisions for herself. She says she will have her lawyer write one up, but it never happens. She's been incapacitated when some major financial issues have come up, and I have had to work around those as best I could...

She knows hse has to do it; she knows it's the right thing; she even consciously wants too.. but she just cant give up that bit of control.

Aat the Dr.s office the other day, on the elevator ride down, I finally said to her "You've lied to me, you've broken your promises to me, I'm tired of you killing yourself jsut to feel like you are in control. You can do it all you want, but if you do, it will be without me. You need to accept that you are no longer in control of your own life; the doctors are; and that is IT!"

She broke down crying, and I had to almost carry her out to the car. Then she spent the next 20 minutes alternately apologizing for her behavior and trying to jsutify it.

At one point she screamed at me "I'm not a drug addict dammit"... as if by sheer will alone she could control the incredibly intense pain and withdrawals from opiates that happen when she stops taking her medication. I'm still convinced that's what triggered her seizures in the first place.

Finally I told her again "Either you stop trying to pretend you arent sick, that you arent hurt, that you have the capability to take care of yourself... either you give it up and jsut do what you have to do to survive; and MAYBE YOU'LL GET BETTER... Either you stop making yourself WORSE EVERY SINGLE DAY; or you've lost me."

Thats it.

I made a similar speech to my ex-wife five years ago; her decision was to stay sick, and get sicker, so I left.

But this is my mother...

Sometimes I just don't know. Theres nothing else I can do. I'm not going to sit by and watch while she kills herself for her stupid pride.

I'm not.

Sunday, July 10, 2005

You know its bad...

When the national weather service issues a sever weather advisory, telling people not to go outisde because...

IT'S TOO DAMN HOT!


National Weather Service Zone - AZZ023

PSRNPWPSR
WWUS75 KPSR 101249
NPWPSR

URGENT - WEATHER MESSAGE
NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE PHOENIX AZ
549 AM MST SUN JUL 10 2005

AZZ022-023-027-028-102300-
GREATER PHOENIX AREA-...
SCOTTSDALE...
549 AM MST SUN JUL 10 2005

HEAT ADVISORY IS IN EFFECT FROM 10 AM UNTIL 8 PM MONDAY FOR
THE DESERT AREAS OF SOUTH-CENTRAL ARIZONA.


THE NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE IN PHOENIX HAS ISSUED A HEAT ADVISORY FOR THE SOUTH-CENTRAL DESERTS OF ARIZONA...INCLUDING THE GREATER PHOENIX AREA...FROM 10 AM UNTIL 8 PM ON MONDAY.

THE EXPECTED AFTERNOON HIGH TEMPERATURE AT PHOENIX ON MONDAY IS 111 DEGREES...AND MOST OF THE SOUTH-CENTRAL DESERTS WILL RANGE BETWEEN 109 AND 112 DEGREES.

IF YOU PLAN TO BE OUTSIDE MONDAY...IT WILL BE HOT...SO AVOID
PROLONGED EXPOSURE TO THE HEAT AND SUN...AND AVOID STRENUOUS PHYSICAL ACTIVITY IF POSSIBLE. YOUR BODY CAN LOSE UP TO A GALLON OF WATER AN HOUR THROUGH PERSPIRATION. STAY IN THE SHADE AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE AND DRINK PLENTY OF NON-ALCOHOLIC FLUIDS TO AVOID DEHYDRATION. WEAR LIGHTWEIGHT...LIGHT-COLORED...LOOSE-FITTING CLOTHING. WEAR A WIDE-BRIMMED HAT TO SHIELD YOURSELF FROM THE SUN.


Now heres the thing, NWS temperature for phoenix is taken in two places, at the airport on a patch of grass at the top of a 12 foot pole; and at the top of a 2700 foot mountain.

This has an irritating effect (at least to me), that the NWS numbers, while useful meteorologically, HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH THE ACTUAL TEMP ON THE GROUND.

Typically seaking, the actual ground temps are from 5-20 degrees hotter than the official temps of the day. I have several accurate thermometers, and on a "109 degree" day, the thermometer I have on my THIRD FLOOR PORCH IN THE SHADE, generally reads 114-117. The official temp yesterday was 109, my thermometer? 117 (the one in my car said 116)

That means if they issue a warning for 112, you can guarandamntee its gonna be over 120 in the streets.

Yay!

Saturday, July 09, 2005

Update on my mom

Still no word yet. They admitted her friday night, but didnt get her into the neuro unit untl 1pm tday. She hasnt had more than the briefest exam or diagnostics... it seems like htey are waiting til monday when the senior docs are all back from vacation.

Meanwhile, they are keeping her as medicated as possible, which brings her pain from 10+ down to 7 or 8. They are worried that any more meds will cause respritory failure.

Doncha just love hospitals

Friday, July 08, 2005

Taking mom to the hospital

It's very not good this time. Two large black spots on her brain, and in her word "The worst head pain I've ever felt in my life".

The neurologist doesnt know what it is, and I've got to get her to the neurosurgeon.

If you dont hear from me for a while, you know where I am.

Thursday, July 07, 2005

God Save England



SARACENO DELENDA EST

Dystopian Sci-Fi, heavy metal, and the british mind

I was lsitening to the radio this morning, and "INto the Void came one. This is a song I really like, but I'd never listened closely to they lyrics before, ad really thoguht aobut them.

Theres somethign about the British mind that makes them write dystopian Sci-Fi. I dont really know what it is, except perhaps a lack of native optimism about the future. I can say that it is clear throughour british Science fiction, and British heavy metal; those brits really expect the future to suck...



Into The Void

Black Sabbath

Rocket engines burning fuel so fast
Up into the night sky they blast
Through the universe the engines whine
Could it be the end of man and time
Back on earth the flame of life burns low
Everywhere is misery and woe
Pollution kills the air, the land and sea
Man prepares to meet his destiny
Rocket engines burning fuel so fast
Up into the night sky so vast
Burning metal through the atmosphere
Earth remains in worry, hate and fear
With the hateful battles raging on
Rockets flying to the glowing sun
Through the empires of eternal void
Freedom from the final suicide

Freedom fighters sent out to the sun
Escape from brainwashed minds and pollution.
Leave the earth to all it’s sin and hate
Find another world where freedom waits.
Past the stars in fields of ancient void
Through the shields of darkness where they find
Love upon a land a world unknown
Where the sons of freedom make their home

Leave the earth to satan and his slaves
Leave them to their future in the grave
Make a home where love is there to stay

Girlfriend update

She's sleeping right next to me righ now... makeup sex is great aint it.

Sometimes, I swear she starts a fight just for the makeup sex.

See here the thing. I dont cry and wail and carry on if she says "I cant be with you any more". I jsut said, "Wwell, I don think thats true, but if thats what you want, fine".

Next day rolls around "Honey, could you come pick me up? I was mad at you, but I'm not anymore"

Sure baby.

Like I said, on-again off again. Honestly, I'm okay with where we are. Shes crazy, and I dont mind. SHes not the kind of crazy that will start a bar fight to see if I'll bleed for her, or to fuck my life up or anything like that. Shes jsut the kind of crazy who will "break up" with me for a day, and then the next day its like it never happened.

I do love the girl. I know shes not the girl I'm gonna spend the rest of my life with or anything, but we have a good time when we arent pissing each other off, the sex is great, and we are comfortable together.

It may sound un-romantic, but being comfortable together is an asset you cant replace easily. Being with someone you can jsut be quiet next to for hours is a rare thing. Being with someone you can read next to in bed, and she not have to jsut say things to fill up space? Priceless guys, priceless.

So yeah, I'm okay with things the way they are. SOmehow I had a feeling this would happen. It isnt the first time, and it porbably wont be the last time. And It'll be the same each time "I hate you" "No you dont, but if that waht you want"....

I tell you this though; if I scremed my undying love and begged her to stay, do you think she'd be back in my bed right now.

Wednesday, July 06, 2005

I actually got a 1540...

But the next year they published the scalar adjustments, and it is a 1600 on the scale they are using today. Also it was before they allowed calculators.








Your SAT Score of 1600 Means:



You Scored Higher Than Howard Stern

You Scored Higher Than George W. Bush

You Scored Higher Than Al Gore

You Scored Higher Than David Duchovny

You Scored Higher Than Natalie Portman

You Scored Higher Than Bill Gates

Your IQ is most likely in the 150+ area

Equivalent ACT score: 36

Schools that Fit Your SAT Score:

California Institute of Technology

Stanford University

Princeton University

Yale University

Harvard University




UPDATE: Late in 2005 they changed the scale again, from a 2x 200-800 point scale, to a 3x 200-800 scale. That means that a perfect score is now a 2400.

However, I also took the SAT-II writing exam (which used to be called the Writing Achievement test), and I got a 740; which would have been adjusted to a 1780 when they changed the scoring scale.

That means my score today would be 2280.

Oh, and I got a 35 on my ACT.

Yet more unsurprising shit volume 27


Your Extroversion Profile:

Assertiveness: Very High
Excitement Seeking: Very High
Activity Level: High
Friendliness: High
Cheerfulness: Medium
Sociability: Medium

No doyeee





You Know You're Addicted to Caffeine When...


You haven't slept since the Clinton Administration.

Your next-door neighbors often call to complain about the sound of your chattering teeth.

Instead of Tic Tacs, you suck on Vivarin.

You plan to name your twins "Cappuccino" and "Espresso."

On the way to work you get pulled over for speeding and you don't even have your car.

You kill a guy for trying to switch your regular coffee to decaffeinated Folgers.

You wake up in the middle of the night screaming "Pepsi! For the love of God, I need Pepsi!"

When a Maxwell House commercial comes on, you actually lick the TV screen.

You drink so much coffee it starts shooting out your ears.

You're shaking like Michael Jackson on his wedding night.

You think sleep is for the weak.

You've just had your 20th cup of coffee within 20 minutes on a Friday afternoon, at 4 o'clock, just so "the milk doesn't go bad over the weekend"

You believe that the coffee bean is a vegetable.

You know from experience caffeine tablets don't dissolve in cola.

You wake up to Mountain Dew, before switching to JOLT.

You can name five flavors of JOLT.

You have a mini-fridge under your desk... and a catheter.

You drink decaf by accident and slip into a coma.

Mountain Dew is the stuff great decisions are made of.

You regard the fact that your hands are shaking as a good sign.

You have tattooed across the knuckles of your hands "JOLT" and "COLA"

Your birthday is a national holiday in Colombia.

You go to sleep just to wake up and smell the coffee.

Your coffee pot is next to your bed and your alarm clock is in the kitchen.

You've ever an airplane's call button just to get a coffee refill.

You've knelt and prayed before a Starbuck's logo.

Your web page has the Mountain Dew color scheme.

You have distilled Jolt Cola to make it more potent.

The dishes in your house are all coffee cups.

You see nothing wrong with using water joe (caffeinated water) to make the coffee you use to take your no-doze.

You believe that sleep is simply a poor substitute for sleep

It's 6:09 AM and you're on your 2nd 20oz. cup of coffee.

You have to drink some form of caffeinated beverage just to sleep.

You'd rather be beaten over the head with a sledgehammer than give up that first cup of coffee in the morning.

You've given up sex, TV, or all forms of meat for Lent before, but can't make it 40 days without caffeine.

You suck on a used coffee filter (full of coffee grounds) whenever the can runs out of coffee.

You dip espresso beans.

You actually get these jokes and pass them on to other friends who are addicted to caffeine.





Get Your Own Addicted Meme Here



More cool things for your blog at
Blogthings





You Know You're Addicted to Coffee When...


You can jump start your car without cables.

You answer the door before people knock.

You get a speeding ticket even when you are parked.

You've worn out your third pair of shoes this week.

Your eyes stay open even when you sneeze.

You grind coffee beans in your mouth.

You can type sixty words per minute -- with your feet.

You soak your dentures in coffee overnight.

You sleep with your eyes open.

You have a picture of your coffee mug on your coffee mug.

Instant coffee takes too long to make.

You channel surf faster without the remote.

You don't sweat... you percolate.

You've built a miniature city out of little plastic stirrers.

You short out motion detectors.

You walk twenty miles on your treadmill before you realize it's not plugged in.

The only time you are standing still is during an earthquake!

You've worn the finish off your coffee table.

All your kids are named Joe.

Juan Valdez named his donkey after you.

People get dizzy just watching you.

Starbucks owns the mortgage on your house.

The nurse needs a scientific calculator to take your pulse.

The Taster's Choice couple wants to adopt you.

When someone asks 'How are you?' you say, 'Good to the last drop'.

You buy milk by the barrel.

You can outlast the Energizer bunny.

You can take a picture of yourself from ten feet away without using the timer.

You can't even remember your second cup.

You chew on other people's fingernails.

You don't even wait for the water to boil anymore.

You don't get mad, you get steamed.

You don't need a hammer to pound in nails.

You don't tan, you roast.

You forget to unwrap candy bars before eating them.

You go to AA meetings just for the free coffee.

You go to sleep just so you can wake up and smell the coffee.

You have to watch videos in fast-forward.

You haven't blinked since the last lunar eclipse.

You help your dog chase its tail.

You introduce your spouse as your coffee mate.

You just completed another sweater and you don't know how to knit.

You lick your coffeepot clean.

You name your cats Cream and Sugar.

You ski uphill.

You speak perfect Arabic without ever taking a lesson.

You speed-walk in your sleep.

You spend every vacation visiting Maxwell House.

You think being called a drip is a compliment.

You think CPR stands for Coffee Provides Resuscitation.

You'd be willing to spend time in a Turkish prison.

Your first-aid kit contains two pints of coffee with an I.V. hookup.

Your coffee mug is insured by Lloyds of London.

Your lips are permanently stuck in the sipping position.

Your nervous twitch registers on the Richter scale.

Your only source of nutrition comes from Sweet & Low.

Your taste buds are so numb; you could drink your lava lamp.

Your Thermos is on wheels.

You're so wired, you pick up AM radio.

You've built a miniature city out of little plastic stirrers.

You've worn out the handle on your favourite mug.

You take your morning coffee with you in the shower.

Your heart beats noticeably faster as a reaction to the smell of coffee.

You actually get these jokes and pass them on to other friends who are addicted to coffee.





Get Your Own Addicted Meme Here



More cool things for your blog at
Blogthings

OK, I didnt plan this one at all

Your Porn Star Name is: Dan Rather


Well, since I grew up in Boston

And lived for some years in Ireland, this isn't exactly surprising:


Your Slanguage Profile

New England Slang: 100%
Aussie Slang: 75%
British Slang: 75%
Victorian Slang: 75%
Canadian Slang: 50%
Southern Slang: 50%
Prison Slang: 25%

I wonder if thats a kosher dog...

You Are 73% American
Most times you are proud to be an American.
Though sometimes the good ole US of A makes you cringe
Still, you know there's no place better suited to be your home.
You love your freedom and no one's going to take it away from you!

Broke up with the girlfriend

A couple hours ago.

This isn't exactly a major surprise, w've been on again off again for almost a year. Now we're off again.

She says I'm "snobby", but apparently has no idea what it means. Of course the fact that I insist that she is using the wrong word jsut makes her say I'm beeing snobby even more.

She seems to think snobby is just a generic term for stubborn, agressive, and slightly arrogant.

snob Audio pronunciation of "sNOBBY" ( P ) Pronunciation Key (snb)
n.
  1. One who tends to patronize, rebuff, or ignore people regarded as social inferiors and imitate, admire, or seek association with people regarded as social superiors.
  2. One who affects an offensive air of self-satisfied superiority in matters of taste or intellect


I will fully and freely admit, I know how smart I am and I make no bones about it, but I am not a snob. I like what I like, which are GOOD things, AND THAT DOESNT MAKE ME A SNOB. I dont dislike or insult other because of their choices, but somehow because I choose good things, insist on good service, and can't stand stupid mistakes or incompetence, that makes me a bad person...


She insluts me in other ways INCORRECTLY as well, and I call her on it. SHe alwsy says "No, you're wrong", and of course I KNOW I'm right, which irritates me even more And god help me if I PROVE beyond all doubt that I am right, because that jsut proves her point.

Yeah, mkay.

Honestly, I got tired of her insulting me all the time, INCORRECTLY. I think I could have lived with it if she was using it correctly, but I'll be damned if I'm insulted for something I'm NOT. Theres plenty of TRUE things you can insult me for.

The other thing is, she absolutely cant stand argument. Any disagreement that gets the slightest bit confrontational or hostile, or argumentative, and she either tunes it out, blows it off, or snaps bout it. And dont you DARE raise your voice to her, or she'll flip out.

So finally I called her on it for the last time, and she said "I can't be with you anymore". Fine with me. The sex was great, the physical affection was nice, and we liked watching movies together. Everything else, we drove each other crazy. I tolerated it because I cared about her, and because I'ma kind guy, and a care giver, but shes really just batshit crazy.

Actually its kind of cute, but I grew up with crazy people, and have had a ton of crazy girlfriends and a REALLY crazy wife, so I have a far higher tolerance than... basically everyone.

Anyway, ladies, here I come... or not.

I'm working 70+ hour weeks, the likliehood of me having enough time and energy to find someone to date asymptotically approaches negative absolute infinity at the moment. The union set of my time and energy functions is Aleph null.

(yes I know that's bad math - for one thing asymptotes assume a 0!=0 origin, I'm jsut trying to be cute here guys. I also know that at least a few of my readers are fellow math and phsyics geks and that will be jarring to them)

Though to my readers, if you know anyone reasonably attractive, who actually understands what's written on this blog, has an entirely too high sex drive, is far to affectionate, only slightly insane, more than a bit kinky, single, female, non-smoker, and living in Arizona (libertarians are a plus, but I always seem to end up with liberals), send her my way.

Of course if you DO know someone like that, I would assume you are keeping her for yourself. After all, you are an intelligent bunch.

I

Objects of lust, a quickie edition

Okay, I jsut want the hell out of one of these:




Thats an S&W model 25, in .45lc, with a tapered barrell, and cocobolo grips...

DAMN that's sexy.

I used to have one of these:



And man, it was one hell of a wheel gun (18 oz, 7 shots of .357... good combo). I had it's all stainless brother the 686p as well, and I MISS them; but I just LOVE the .45lc round.

I don't know why, it jsut always seemed like the ideal revolver round to me. Aand with modern guns, and handloading, you can push some DAMN fine numbers our of one.

Besides, that model 25, would be a great companion piece for this:



But I think I'd want mine blued, with cocoblo furniture to match the 25 (oh and yes, that's an alaskan co-pilot takedown, available in everyting from .357 magnum, to .50 alaskan)

UPDATE: Kevin Baker is buying himself the very model 25 I want... bastard

Tuesday, July 05, 2005

Gutting the ATFE

Read this and then come back to me:

http://www.givemeliberty.org/RTPLawsuit/Update2005-07-04.htm


Done? Good....

Now this case is about taxes, but theres something very important about the courts nterpretation of the delegated powers of the executive branch.

Most significantly, the Court held, relying on a 1920 decision by the United States Supreme Court, that the principles of due process apply to all administrative orders. We take that to mean the Court’s order applies not only to IRS first party summonses, but also to IRS third party summonses, and to IRS levies and liens.

In what may be the most significant sentence in the 13-page decision, the court stated:

“The rule of due process upon which we relied in Schulz I, and upon which we rely now, can be stated thus; any legislative scheme that denies subjects an opportunity to seek judicial review of administrative orders except by refusing to comply, and so put themselves in immediate jeopardy of possible penalties ‘so heavy as to prohibit resort to that remedy,’ Oklahoma Operating Co. v. Love, 252 U.S. 331, 333 (1920), runs afoul of the due process requirements of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments.“ [Page 10].

Although the objects in contention in Schulz were IRS administrative summonses, it is unavoidable that the Due Process issues raised and articulated by the Court in Schulz have direct implication for all forms of routine IRS administrative process including liens, levies and seizures. This decision reiterates those constitutional principles.

One might note, this also GUTS THE ATFE COMPLETELY.

Why?

Because all they have are administrative procedures. None of their rules are actually laws. Prior to this decision the administrative procedure was how the executive branch got around constitutional challenges, because it is very difficult to challenge the constitutionality of them in court. THe executive powers for administering laws are very broad, and widely open to interpretation. Well this decision basically says they have NO VALIDITY UNDER THE LAW; without a federal court order backing them, they are merely a request.

Let me repeat this, THIS GUTS THE ATFE COMPLETELY…

All those lists of parts etc… that aren't in any legislation as illegal? Nope, now they need a law, or a court order to say they are illegal. Not only that, but it's going to be pretty damned hard to find grounds for those court orders. Before they always hid behind the shield of "administrative procedure", but NO MORE.

This applies to many executive orders as well; specifically those not applying to national security, war powers, or the military, and affecting domestic issues or american citizens within the united states and its territories (Exective orders are writs from god everywhere else, presuming we can enforce them that is).

See the ATFE, the DOJ, and the Commerce departments have had these lists of guns and parts that couldnt be imported... Well unless it's formalized in blackletter law, IT'S GONE.

Oh and in '86 the ATF put in place an administrative procedure that banned the production of new automatic weapons for sale to non-law enforcement civilians; guess swhat, IT'S GONE.

Not only that, but because of this ruling, and until they get a court order or law that says otherwise, IT’S AS IF THEY WERE NEVER IN FORCE; because they never were legal; at least for new "offenses" that have not yet been adjudicated. Once a judge has ruled, then the adminsitrative procedure has the force of law... but here the great part... ONLY FOR THAT PARTICULAR INSTANCE. A judge will have to rule on each individual case or warrant until and unless they produce actual federal law.

This just completely destroys the ATFE, and a whole bunch of other federal agencies. It may do the same for states under supremacy doctrine if the administrative procedure used by the state is found to violate due process, or any other constitutionally controlled issue.

I'm thinking that gun owners in CA, NY, MA, and NJ might have somethign to say about that... maybe using the "Arbitrary and Capricious" doctrine, equal rotection, or hell even making a 2A claim (never gonna happen. Lawyers are too scared).

Of course it is also a MASSIVE power grab for the federal bench; not that that is in any way surprising...

Oh, and no matter what the courts say, ATFE will still come and blow your house up, possibly killing you, or your elderly neighbors in the process if they think you are a violator. It’s not like they are going to let a little thing like law, due process, or the constitution get in their way.

Just ask David Koresh... Oh wait....

UPDATE:

Ok, a few people have commented that "thats unrealistic" or "the REAL application is more limited" or "Correct in principal but in reality" etc...

Yep, they are right.

Ok, I am speaking in the judicial ideal here; as I said, as a practical matter it is a different world. The ATF is still going to do whatever it wants to do, unless a judge forces them to do otherwise, which means going to court.

What this really does is, once you actually get to court, the burden of proof for justification or the policy shifts now to the government; and if they can't positively justify the policy, it has no force.

We dont have to argue a negative defense against the administrative procedure, they have to argue an affirmative application.

It also means they can't simply seize and destroy property based on their administrative procedures. In fact I dont think a seizure warrant would be sufficient, I believe they would actually need to amke a positive justification of their seizure and destruction separately from a warrant, giving you the opportunity to respond (if my reading of the due process argument is correct anyway).

And of course this still has to go to the supremes, who one might have noted recently, are loathe to limit the power of the state.

On a fundamental level, what I say is true, but fundamental vs. practical....

Reconquista...

I just got this in from MinuteMan HQ. I'm exepriencing mixed emotions here, anger at the action, and satisfaction that these scumbags in the reconquista movement are finally being exposed for what they are...

June 29, 2005

CLAIM FILED AGAINST MAYOR OF BALDWIN PARK FOR SUPPORTING

HATE CRIMES & RICO VIOLATIONS AGAINST SENIOR CITIZEN

(Baldwin Park, CA) The law firm of Lively & Ackerman, of Temecula, CA, has filed a formal governmental claim against the City of Baldwin Park, its Mayor, and Police Department. the firm represents Murrieta senior citizen Laura "Dottie" Dalton. According to the claim, "This governmental claim relates to an incident that took place on May 14, 2005, near the Danza Indigenas monument at the Baldwin Park Metrolink Station. The Claimant is a senior citizen who attended a peaceful protest against racism engaged in by the City of Baldwin Park through its support of a monument which denounces white and other non-Latinos. Specifically, there was a protest and counter-protest that took place on May 14, 2005. The issues that evoked the controversy specifically arise from the fact that the tax-supported monument has quotes that read “It was better before they came [obviously referring to Americans of European or ‘white descent],” and “This land was Mexican once, was Indian always and will be again.” The Mayor of Baldwin Park was present in support of the monument and the protesters who support the continued display of these racist, separatist and discriminatory comments."

The claim goes on to state that, "Mayor Lozano appeared to support racist comments made by protesters against Claimant, and endorsed discriminatory comments made by his fellow protesters. Other City Council members were also present at the protest, which eventually turned into an anti-white mob. [...] Furthermore, many of the attendees at the event were known to be here in the United States illegally. Instead of enforcing the law against their illicit presence, and thereby reducing the risk of a large mob mentality, the members of the City Council present at the event actively discouraged any enforcement of the law and actually incited protesters to attack those who were near Claimant. After inciting the crowd, members of the crowd did actually start throwing heavy objects toward Claimant. Claimant LAURA “DOTTIE” DALTON was hit by a full bottle of water that was intentionally hurled at a high velocity at the Claimant at about 1:00 pm." The medical records of Ms. Dalton indicate that she suffered a brain hemorrhage as a result of the foreseeable violence escalated by the Mayor of Baldwin Park.

The claim seeks one million dollars in compensation for medical bills, future medical expenses, and punitive damages. The claim also requests that the City of Baldwin Park eliminate the racist comments set forth in the challenged monument. The City must respond to the claim in a manner prescribed by the California Government Code.

A copy of the actual claim is attached hereto.

You know you're too much of a military geek when....

You're sitting on the rooftop observation deck of your friends mountainside luxury home, looking out over the 40+ mile, 270 degree view...

And instead of thinking "Hey, Nice view" all you can think is:

"Hmmm, other than being a little exposed this would be a great OP (observation point). We could give full BDA and FCO on the entire valley from here... too bad about the nasty enfilade , that just means we'll need to keep the patrols out further... hmmm, good sight lines for the 240's and a few natural obstacles... now if we could only protect that ridgeline properly..."
It's even worse when you say it out loud.

Or when looking a new place to live, instead of checking out the decor, and the appliance and fixtures your first thoughts are
"Hmm, good sightlines, no viable ambush points, nice thick walls.. yeah that hallways is a perfect funnel into a kill zone... Nice E&E out of the neighborhood, easy access out of town... Yeah this is defensible, I could live here"


Feel free to add your own.

Monday, July 04, 2005

We Hold THese Truths...

When in the course of human events it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.

--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed,

--That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.


--Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.

He has refuted his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.

He has forbidden his Governors to pass Laws of immediate and pressing importance, unless suspended in their operation till his Assent should be obtained; and when so suspended, he has utterly neglected to attend to them.

He has refused to pass other Laws for the accommodation of large districts of people, unless those people would relinquish the right of Representation in the Legislature, a right inestimable to them and formidable to tyrants only.

He has called together legislative bodies at places unusual, uncomfortable, and distant from the depository of their Public Records, for the sole purpose of fatiguing them into compliance with his measures.

He has dissolved Representative Houses repeatedly, for opposing with manly firmness his invasions on the rights of the people.

He has refused for a long time, after such dissolutions, to cause others to be elected, whereby the Legislative Powers, incapable of Annihilation, have returned to the People at large for their exercise; the State remaining in the mean time exposed to all the dangers of invasion from without, and convulsions within.

He has endeavoured to prevent the population of these States; for that purpose obstructing the Laws for Naturalization of Foreigners; refusing to pass others to encourage their migrations hither, and raising the conditions of new Appropriations of Lands.

He has obstructed the Administration of Justice by refusing his Assent to Laws for establishing Judiciary Powers.

He has made Judges dependent on his Will alone for the tenure of their offices, and the amount and payment of their salaries.

He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harass our people and eat out their substance.

He has kept among us, in times of peace, Standing Armies without the Consent of our legislatures.

He has affected to render the Military independent of and superior to the Civil Power.

He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his Assent to their Acts of pretended Legislation:

For quartering large bodies of armed troops among us:

For protecting them, by a mock Trial from punishment for any Murders which they should commit on the Inhabitants of these States:

For cutting off our Trade with all parts of the world:

For imposing Taxes on us without our Consent:

For depriving us in many cases, of the benefit of Trial by Jury:

For transporting us beyond Seas to be tried for pretended offences:

For abolishing the free System of English Laws in a neighbouring Province, establishing therein an Arbitrary government, and enlarging its Boundaries so as to render it at once an example and fit instrument for introducing the same absolute rule into these Colonies

For taking away our Charters, abolishing our most valuable Laws and altering fundamentally the Forms of our Governments:

For suspending our own Legislatures, and declaring themselves invested with power to legislate for us in all cases whatsoever.

He has abdicated Government here, by declaring us out of his Protection and waging War against us.

He has plundered our seas, ravaged our Coasts burnt our towns, and destroyed the lives of our people.

He is at this time transporting large Armies of foreign Mercenaries to compleat the works of death, desolation, and tyranny, already begun with circumstances of Cruelty & Perfidy scarcely paralleled in the most barbarous ages, and totally unworthy the Head of a civilized nation.

He has constrained our fellow Citizens taken Captive on the high Seas to bear Arms against their Country, to become the executioners of their friends and Brethren, or to fall themselves by their Hands.

He has excited domestic insurrections amongst us, and has endeavoured to bring on the inhabitants of our frontiers, the merciless Indian Savages whose known rule of warfare, is an undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes and conditions.

In every stage of these Oppressions We have Petitioned for Redress in the most humble terms: Our repeated Petitions have been answered only by repeated injury. A Prince, whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a Tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people.

Nor have We been wanting in attentions to our British brethren. We have warned them from time to time of attempts by their legislature to extend an unwarrantable jurisdiction over us. We have reminded them of the circumstances of our emigration and settlement here. We have appealed to their native justice and magnanimity, and we have conjured them by the ties of our common kindred. to disavow these usurpations, which would inevitably interrupt our connections and correspondence. They too have been deaf to the voice of justice and of consanguinity. We must, therefore, acquiesce in the necessity, which denounces our Separation, and hold them, as we hold the rest of mankind, Enemies in War, in Peace Friends.

We, therefore, the Representatives of the United States of America, in General Congress, Assembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions, do, in the Name, and by Authority of the good People of these Colonies, solemnly publish and declare, That these United Colonies are, and of Right ought to be Free and Independent States, that they are Absolved from all Allegiance to the British Crown, and that all political connection between them and the State of Great Britain, is and ought to be totally dissolved; and that as Free and Independent States, they have full Power to levy War, conclude Peace contract Alliances, establish Commerce, and to do all other Acts and Things which Independent States may of right do.

--And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of Divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes and our sacred Honor.

--John Hancock

New Hampshire:
Josiah Bartlett, William Whipple, Matthew Thornton

Massachusetts:
John Hancock, Samuel Adams, John Adams, Robert Treat Paine, Elbridge Gerry

Rhode Island:
Stephen Hopkins, William Ellery

Connecticut:
Roger Sherman, Samuel Huntington, William Williams, Oliver Wolcott

New York:
William Floyd, Philip Livingston, Francis Lewis, Lewis Morris

New Jersey:
Richard Stockton, John Witherspoon, Francis Hopkinson, John Hart, Abraham Clark

Pennsylvania:
Robert Morris, Benjamin Rush, Benjamin Franklin, John Morton, George Clymer, James Smith, George Taylor, James Wilson, George Ross

Delaware:
Caesar Rodney, George Read, Thomas McKean

Maryland:
Samuel Chase, William Paca, Thomas Stone, Charles Carroll of Carrollton

Virginia:
George Wythe, Richard Henry Lee, Thomas Jefferson, Benjamin Harrison, Thomas Nelson, Jr., Francis Lightfoot Lee, Carter Braxton

North Carolina:
William Hooper, Joseph Hewes, John Penn

South Carolina:
Edward Rutledge, Thomas Heyward, Jr., Thomas Lynch, Jr., Arthur Middleton

Georgia:
Button Gwinnett, Lyman Hall, George Walton


THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION



We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.

Article. I.

Section 1.

All legislative Powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States, which shall consist of a Senate and House of Representatives.

Section. 2.

Clause 1: The House of Representatives shall be composed of Members chosen every second Year by the People of the several States, and the Electors in each State shall have the Qualifications requisite for Electors of the most numerous Branch of the State Legislature.

Clause 2: No Person shall be a Representative who shall not have attained to the Age of twenty five Years, and been seven Years a Citizen of the United States, and who shall not, when elected, be an Inhabitant of that State in which he shall be chosen.

Clause 3: Representatives and direct Taxes shall be apportioned among the several States which may be included within this Union, according to their respective Numbers, which shall be determined by adding to the whole Number of free Persons, including those bound to Service for a Term of Years, and excluding Indians not taxed, three fifths of all other Persons. (See Note 2) The actual Enumeration shall be made within three Years after the first Meeting of the Congress of the United States, and within every subsequent Term of ten Years, in such Manner as they shall by Law direct. The Number of Representatives shall not exceed one for every thirty Thousand, but each State shall have at Least one Representative; and until such enumeration shall be made, the State of New Hampshire shall be entitled to chuse three, Massachusetts eight, Rhode-Island and Providence Plantations one, Connecticut five, New-York six, New Jersey four, Pennsylvania eight, Delaware one, Maryland six, Virginia ten, North Carolina five, South Carolina five, and Georgia three.

Clause 4: When vacancies happen in the Representation from any State, the Executive Authority thereof shall issue Writs of Election to fill such Vacancies.

Clause 5: The House of Representatives shall chuse their Speaker and other Officers; and shall have the sole Power of Impeachment.

Section. 3.

Clause 1: The Senate of the United States shall be composed of two Senators from each State, chosen by the Legislature thereof, (See Note 3) for six Years; and each Senator shall have one Vote.

Clause 2: Immediately after they shall be assembled in Consequence of the first Election, they shall be divided as equally as may be into three Classes. The Seats of the Senators of the first Class shall be vacated at the Expiration of the second Year, of the second Class at the Expiration of the fourth Year, and of the third Class at the Expiration of the sixth Year, so that one third may be chosen every second Year; and if Vacancies happen by Resignation, or otherwise, during the Recess of the Legislature of any State, the Executive thereof may make temporary Appointments until the next Meeting of the Legislature, which shall then fill such Vacancies. (See Note 4)

Clause 3: No Person shall be a Senator who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty Years, and been nine Years a Citizen of the United States, and who shall not, when elected, be an Inhabitant of that State for which he shall be chosen.

Clause 4: The Vice President of the United States shall be President of the Senate, but shall have no Vote, unless they be equally divided.

Clause 5: The Senate shall chuse their other Officers, and also a President pro tempore, in the Absence of the Vice President, or when he shall exercise the Office of President of the United States.

Clause 6: The Senate shall have the sole Power to try all Impeachments. When sitting for that Purpose, they shall be on Oath or Affirmation. When the President of the United States is tried, the Chief Justice shall preside: And no Person shall be convicted without the Concurrence of two thirds of the Members present.

Clause 7: Judgment in Cases of Impeachment shall not extend further than to removal from Office, and disqualification to hold and enjoy any Office of honor, Trust or Profit under the United States: but the Party convicted shall nevertheless be liable and subject to Indictment, Trial, Judgment and Punishment, according to Law.

Section. 4.

Clause 1: The Times, Places and Manner of holding Elections for Senators and Representatives, shall be prescribed in each State by the Legislature thereof; but the Congress may at any time by Law make or alter such Regulations, except as to the Places of chusing Senators.

Clause 2: The Congress shall assemble at least once in every Year, and such Meeting shall be on the first Monday in December, (See Note 5) unless they shall by Law appoint a different Day.

Section. 5.

Clause 1: Each House shall be the Judge of the Elections, Returns and Qualifications of its own Members, and a Majority of each shall constitute a Quorum to do Business; but a smaller Number may adjourn from day to day, and may be authorized to compel the Attendance of absent Members, in such Manner, and under such Penalties as each House may provide.

Clause 2: Each House may determine the Rules of its Proceedings, punish its Members for disorderly Behaviour, and, with the Concurrence of two thirds, expel a Member.

Clause 3: Each House shall keep a Journal of its Proceedings, and from time to time publish the same, excepting such Parts as may in their Judgment require Secrecy; and the Yeas and Nays of the Members of either House on any question shall, at the Desire of one fifth of those Present, be entered on the Journal.

Clause 4: Neither House, during the Session of Congress, shall, without the Consent of the other, adjourn for more than three days, nor to any other Place than that in which the two Houses shall be sitting.

Section. 6.

Clause 1: The Senators and Representatives shall receive a Compensation for their Services, to be ascertained by Law, and paid out of the Treasury of the United States. (See Note 6) They shall in all Cases, except Treason, Felony and Breach of the Peace, beprivileged from Arrest during their Attendance at the Session of their respective Houses, and in going to and returning from the same; and for any Speech or Debate in either House, they shall not be questioned in any other Place.

Clause 2: No Senator or Representative shall, during the Time for which he was elected, be appointed to any civil Office under the Authority of the United States, which shall have been created, or the Emoluments whereof shall have been encreased during such time; and no Person holding any Office under the United States, shall be a Member of either House during his Continuance in Office.

Section. 7.

Clause 1: All Bills for raising Revenue shall originate in the House of Representatives; but the Senate may propose or concur with Amendments as on other Bills.

Clause 2: Every Bill which shall have passed the House of Representatives and the Senate, shall, before it become a Law, be presented to the President of the United States; If he approve he shall sign it, but if not he shall return it, with his Objections to that House in which it shall have originated, who shall enter the Objections at large on their Journal, and proceed to reconsider it. If after such Reconsideration two thirds of that House shall agree to pass the Bill, it shall be sent, together with the Objections, to the other House, by which it shall likewise be reconsidered, and if approved by two thirds of that House, it shall become a Law. But in all such Cases the Votes of both Houses shall be determined by yeas and Nays, and the Names of the Persons voting for and against the Bill shall be entered on the Journal of each House respectively. If any Bill shall not be returned by the President within ten Days (Sundays excepted) after it shall have been presented to him, the Same shall be a Law, in like Manner as if he had signed it, unless the Congress by their Adjournment prevent its Return, in which Case it shall not be a Law.

Clause 3: Every Order, Resolution, or Vote to which the Concurrence of the Senate and House of Representatives may be necessary (except on a question of Adjournment) shall be presented to the President of the United States; and before the Same shall take Effect, shall be approved by him, or being disapproved by him, shall be repassed by two thirds of the Senate and House of Representatives, according to the Rules and Limitations prescribed in the Case of a Bill.

Section. 8.

Clause 1: The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States;

Clause 2: To borrow Money on the credit of the United States;

Clause 3: To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes;

Clause 4: To establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization, and uniform Laws on the subject of Bankruptcies throughout the United States;

Clause 5: To coin Money, regulate the Value thereof, and of foreign Coin, and fix the Standard of Weights and Measures;

Clause 6: To provide for the Punishment of counterfeiting the Securities and current Coin of the United States;

Clause 7: To establish Post Offices and post Roads;

Clause 8: To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries;

Clause 9: To constitute Tribunals inferior to the supreme Court;

Clause 10: To define and punish Piracies and Felonies committed on the high Seas, and Offences against the Law of Nations;

Clause 11: To declare War, grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal, and make Rules concerning Captures on Land and Water;

Clause 12: To raise and support Armies, but no Appropriation of Money to that Use shall be for a longer Term than two Years;

Clause 13: To provide and maintain a Navy;

Clause 14: To make Rules for the Government and Regulation of the land and naval Forces;

Clause 15: To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions;

Clause 16: To provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining, the Militia, and for governing such Part of them as may be employed in the Service of the United States, reserving to the States respectively, the Appointment of the Officers, and the Authority of training the Militia according to the discipline prescribed by Congress;

Clause 17: To exercise exclusive Legislation in all Cases whatsoever, over such District (not exceeding ten Miles square) as may, byCession of particular States, and the Acceptance of Congress, become the Seat of the Government of the United States, and to exercise like Authority over all Places purchased by the Consent of the Legislature of the State in which the Same shall be, for the Erection of Forts, Magazines, Arsenals, dock-Yards, and other needful Buildings;--And

Clause 18: To make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers, and all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any Department or Officer thereof.

Section. 9.

Clause 1: The Migration or Importation of such Persons as any of the States now existing shall think proper to admit, shall not be prohibited by the Congress prior to the Year one thousand eight hundred and eight, but a Tax or duty may be imposed on such Importation, not exceeding ten dollars for each Person.

Clause 2: The Privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public Safety may require it.

Clause 3: No Bill of Attainder or ex post facto Law shall be passed.

Clause 4: No Capitation, or other direct, Tax shall be laid, unless in Proportion to the Census or Enumeration herein before directed to be taken. (See Note 7)

Clause 5: No Tax or Duty shall be laid on Articles exported from any State.

Clause 6: No Preference shall be given by any Regulation of Commerce or Revenue to the Ports of one State over those of another: nor shall Vessels bound to, or from, one State, be obliged to enter, clear, or pay Duties in another.

Clause 7: No Money shall be drawn from the Treasury, but in Consequence of Appropriations made by Law; and a regular Statement and Account of the Receipts and Expenditures of all public Money shall be published from time to time.

Clause 8: No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States: And no Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them, shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or foreign State.

Section. 10.

Clause 1: No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation; grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal; coin Money; emit Bills of Credit; make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts; pass any Bill of Attainder, ex post facto Law, or Law impairing the Obligation of Contracts, or grant any Title of Nobility.

Clause 2: No State shall, without the Consent of the Congress, lay any Imposts or Duties on Imports or Exports, except what may be absolutely necessary for executing it's inspection Laws: and the net Produce of all Duties and Imposts, laid by any State on Imports or Exports, shall be for the Use of the Treasury of the United States; and all such Laws shall be subject to the Revision and Controul of the Congress.

Clause 3: No State shall, without the Consent of Congress, lay any Duty of Tonnage, keep Troops, or Ships of War in time of Peace, enter into any Agreement or Compact with another State, or with a foreign Power, or engage in War, unless actually invaded, or in such imminent Danger as will not admit of delay.

Article. II.

Section. 1.

Clause 1: The executive Power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America. He shall hold his Office during the Term of four Years, and, together with the Vice President, chosen for the same Term, be elected, as follows

Clause 2: Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors, equal to the whole Number of Senators and Representatives to which the State may be entitled in the Congress: but no Senator or Representative, or Person holding an Office of Trust or Profit under the United States, shall be appointed an Elector.

Clause 3: The Electors shall meet in their respective States, and vote by Ballot for two Persons, of whom one at least shall not be an Inhabitant of the same State with themselves. And they shall make a List of all the Persons voted for, and of the Number of Votes for each; which List they shall sign and certify, and transmit sealed to the Seat of the Government of the United States, directed to the President of the Senate. The President of the Senate shall, in the Presence of the Senate and House of Representatives, open all the Certificates, and the Votes shall then be counted. The Person having the greatest Number of Votes shall be the President, if such Number be a Majority of the whole Number of Electors appointed; and if there be more than one who have such Majority, and have an equal Number of Votes, then the House of Representatives shall immediately chuse by Ballot one of them for President; and if no Person have a Majority, then from the five highest on the List the said House shall in like Manner chuse the President. But in chusing the President, the Votes shall be taken by States, the Representation from each State having one Vote; A quorum for this Purpose shall consist of a Member or Members from two thirds of the States, and a Majority of all the States shall be necessary to a Choice. In every Case, after the Choice of the President, the Person having the greatest Number of Votes of the Electors shall be the Vice President. But if there should remain two or more who have equal Votes, the Senate shall chuse from them by Ballot the Vice President. (See Note 8)

Clause 4: The Congress may determine the Time of chusing the Electors, and the Day on which they shall give their Votes; which Day shall be the same throughout the United States.

Clause 5: No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.

Clause 6: In Case of the Removal of the President from Office, or of his Death, Resignation, or Inability to discharge the Powers and Duties of the said Office, (See Note 9) the Same shall devolve on the VicePresident, and the Congress may by Law provide for the Case of Removal, Death, Resignation or Inability, both of the President and Vice President, declaring what Officer shall then act as President, and such Officer shall act accordingly, until the Disability be removed, or a President shall be elected.

Clause 7: The President shall, at stated Times, receive for his Services, a Compensation, which shall neither be encreased nor diminished during the Period for which he shall have been elected, and he shall not receive within that Period any other Emolument from the United States, or any of them.

Clause 8: Before he enter on the Execution of his Office, he shall take the following Oath or Affirmation:--"I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States."

Section. 2.

Clause 1: The President shall be Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the Militia of the several States, when called into the actual Service of the United States; he may require the Opinion, in writing, of the principal Officer in each of the executive Departments, upon any Subject relating to the Duties of their respective Offices, and he shall have Power to grant Reprieves and Pardons for Offences against the United States, except in Cases of Impeachment.

Clause 2: He shall have Power, by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, to make Treaties, provided two thirds of the Senators present concur; and he shall nominate, and by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, shall appoint Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, Judges of the supreme Court, and all other Officers of the United States, whose Appointments are not herein otherwise provided for, and which shall be established by Law: but the Congress may by Law vest the Appointment of such inferior Officers, as they think proper, in the President alone, in the Courts of Law, or in the Heads of Departments.

Clause 3: The President shall have Power to fill up all Vacancies that may happen during the Recess of the Senate, by granting Commissions which shall expire at the End of their next Session.

Section. 3.

He shall from time to time give to the Congress Information of the State of the Union, and recommend to their Consideration such Measures as he shall judge necessary and expedient; he may, on extraordinary Occasions, convene both Houses, or either of them, and in Case of Disagreement between them, with Respect to the Time of Adjournment, he may adjourn them to such Time as he shall think proper; he shall receive Ambassadors and other public Ministers; he shall take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed, and shall Commission all the Officers of the United States.

Section. 4.

The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.

Article. III.

Section. 1.

The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish. The Judges, both of the supreme and inferior Courts, shall hold their Offices during good Behaviour, and shall, at stated Times, receive for their Services, a Compensation, which shall not be diminished during their Continuance in Office.

Section. 2.

Clause 1: The judicial Power shall extend to all Cases, in Law and Equity, arising under this Constitution, the Laws of the United States, and Treaties made, or which shall be made, under their Authority;--to all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls;--to all Cases of admiralty and maritime Jurisdiction;--to Controversies to which the United States shall be a Party;--to Controversies between two or more States;--between a State and Citizens of another State; (See Note 10)--between Citizens of different States, --between Citizens of the same State claiming Lands under Grants of different States, and between a State, or the Citizens thereof, and foreign States, Citizens or Subjects.

Clause 2: In all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, and those in which a State shall be Party, the supreme Court shall have original Jurisdiction. In all the other Cases before mentioned, the supreme Court shall have appellate Jurisdiction, both as to Law and Fact, with such Exceptions, and under such Regulations as the Congress shall make.

Clause 3: The Trial of all Crimes, except in Cases of Impeachment, shall be by Jury; and such Trial shall be held in the State where the said Crimes shall have been committed; but when not committed within any State, the Trial shall be at such Place or Places as the Congress may by Law have directed.

Section. 3.

Clause 1: Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.

Clause 2: The Congress shall have Power to declare the Punishment of Treason, but no Attainder of Treason shall work Corruption of Blood, or Forfeiture except during the Life of the Person attainted.

Article. IV.

Section. 1.

Full Faith and Credit shall be given in each State to the public Acts, Records, and judicial Proceedings of every other State. And the Congress may by general Laws prescribe the Manner in which such Acts, Records and Proceedings shall be proved, and the Effect thereof.

Section. 2.

Clause 1: The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States.

Clause 2: A Person charged in any State with Treason, Felony, or other Crime, who shall flee from Justice, and be found in another State, shall on Demand of the executive Authority of the State from which he fled, be delivered up, to be removed to the State having Jurisdiction of the Crime.

Clause 3: No Person held to Service or Labour in one State, under the Laws thereof, escaping into another, shall, in Consequence of any Law or Regulation therein, be discharged from such Service or Labour, but shall be delivered up on Claim of the Party to whom such Service or Labour may be due. (See Note 11)

Section. 3.

Clause 1: New States may be admitted by the Congress into this Union; but no new State shall be formed or erected within the Jurisdiction of any other State; nor any State be formed by the Junction of two or more States, or Parts of States, without the Consent of the Legislatures of the States concerned as well as of the Congress.

Clause 2: The Congress shall have Power to dispose of and make all needful Rules and Regulations respecting the Territory or other Property belonging to the United States; and nothing in this Constitution shall be so construed as to Prejudice any Claims of the United States, or of any particular State.

Section. 4.

The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened) against domestic Violence.

Article. V.

The Congress, whenever two thirds of both Houses shall deem it necessary, shall propose Amendments to this Constitution, or, on the Application of the Legislatures of two thirds of the several States, shall call a Convention for proposing Amendments, which, in either Case, shall be valid to all Intents and Purposes, as Part of this Constitution, when ratified by the Legislatures of three fourths of the several States, or by Conventions in three fourths thereof, as the one or the other Mode of Ratification may be proposed by the Congress; Provided that no Amendment which may be made prior to the Year One thousand eight hundred and eight shall in any Manner affect the first and fourth Clauses in the Ninth Section of the first Article; and that no State, without its Consent, shall be deprived of its equal Suffrage in the Senate.

Article. VI.

Clause 1: All Debts contracted and Engagements entered into, before the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be as valid against the United States under this Constitution, as under the Confederation.

Clause 2: This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.

Clause 3: The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States.

Article. VII.

The Ratification of the Conventions of nine States, shall be sufficient for the Establishment of this Constitution between the States so ratifying the Same.

done in Convention by the Unanimous Consent of the States present the Seventeenth Day of September in the Year of our Lord one thousand seven hundred and Eighty seven and of the Independence of the United States of America the Twelfth In witness whereof We have hereunto subscribed our Names,




The Star Spangled Banner
Francis Scot Key
-to the tune of "To Anachreon in Heaven"


O say can you see, by the dawn's early light,
What so proudly we hail'd at the twilight's last gleaming,
Whose broad stripes and bright stars through the perilous fight
O'er the ramparts we watch'd were so gallantly streaming?
And the rocket's red glare, the bomb bursting in air,
Gave proof through the night that our flag was still there,
O say does that star-spangled banner yet wave
O'er the land of the free and the home of the brave?

On the shore dimly seen through the mists of the deep
Where the foe's haughty host in dread silence reposes,
What is that which the breeze, o'er the towering steep,
As it fitfully blows, half conceals, half discloses?
Now it catches the gleam of the morning's first beam,
In full glory reflected now shines in the stream,
'Tis the star-spangled banner - O long may it wave
O'er the land of the free and the home of the brave!

And where is that band who so vauntingly swore,
That the havoc of war and the battle's confusion
A home and a Country should leave us no more?
Their blood has wash'd out their foul footstep's pollution.
No refuge could save the hireling and slave
From the terror of flight or the gloom of the grave,
And the star-spangled banner in triumph doth wave
O'er the land of the free and the home of the brave.

O thus be it ever when freemen shall stand
Between their lov'd home and the war's desolation!
Blest with vict'ry and peace may the heav'n rescued land
Praise the power that hath made and preserv'd us a nation!
Then conquer we must, when our cause it is just,
And this be our motto - "In God is our trust,"
And the star-spangled banner in triumph shall wave
O'er the land of the free and the home of the brave.




Four score and seven years ago our fathers brought forth on this continent a new nation, conceived in liberty and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal.

Now we are engaged in a great civil war, testing whether that nation or any nation so conceived and so dedicated can long endure. We are met on a great battlefield of that war. We have come to dedicate a portion of that field as a final resting-place for those who here gave their lives that that nation might live. It is altogether fitting and proper that we should do this. But in a larger sense, we cannot dedicate, we cannot consecrate, we cannot hallow this ground. The brave men, living and dead who struggled here have consecrated it far above our poor power to add or detract. The world will little note nor long remember what we say here, but it can never forget what they did here.

It is for us the living rather to be dedicated here to the unfinished work which they who fought here have thus far so nobly advanced. It is rather for us to be here dedicated to the great task remaining before us--that from these honored dead we take increased devotion to that cause for which they gave the last full measure of devotion--that we here highly resolve that these dead shall not have died in vain, that this nation under God shall have a new birth of freedom, and that government of the people, by the people, for the people shall not perish from the earth.




God Bless America

Friday, July 01, 2005

Off for the weekend...

Well its off for the three day weeend.

Chili, Barbecue, Beer, Guns, and Girlfriend for me this weekend.

Here's hoping yours is just as good.

And remember, Independence days is a true celbration of our freedom, our independence, and our greatness as a nation. Don't waste it.

I didnt miss it this week...

Yes folks, I'm back in the carnival of cordite, having missed last week by forgetting to post and link etc.... These 70-80 hour weeks are killing me.

Here is your linky goodness:

http://gullyborg.typepad.com/weblog_archive/2005/07/carnival_of_cor.html


Next week I have a ocuple of interesting things, including some Gratuitous Gun Pics and fun with 1911's.