Wednesday, March 30, 2005

Why bullpups aren't a great solution

For some reason, the bullpup rifle keeps being put forward as a good idea.

...Really, for the most part, they are not.

I'm an engineer and a firearms expert; by training, inclination, experience, and employment. I'm a veteran, a former security contractor, a firearms trainer, and an FFL, gunsmith and class III manufacturer.

I have a great appreciation for good engineering. Bullpups are, in general, not good engineering.

The bullpup rifle has one real advantage: bullpup designs allow for a shorter overall weapon, for a given length of barrel (typically between 4" and 7" shorter than a conventional rifle).

That's not an insignificant advantage. In some missions it's even a huge asset (particularly in urban combat, or infantry dismounted from armored vehicles).

In most missions though, that 4-7 inches isn't much of a plus.

On the other hand, the bullpup configuration has a number of disadvantages:
  • Bullpup designs are mechanically more complex, requiring a long trigger linkage, and control system linkages. This seriously degrades both control feel, and reliability, and increases bulk and weight (there may be engineering solutions to this problem).

    If current munitions infrastructure and laws allowed for electronic trigger, feed, and ignition systems, this would be a non issue, and the bullpups advantage may outweigh it's several disadvantages; but for now, that's not an option (also, electronic systems have their own issues).

  • If a bullpup has a catastrophic failure, instead of the explosion being six or eight inches in front of your eyes, it's right at your eyesocket, or touching your cheekbone or ear. The only good thing is, if the bolt flys back, it doesn't end up in your eye socket.

    Most bullpups also eject hot brass, and vent hot gasses in the vicinity of your eyes and ears (some eject downward or forward, which is a better solution for a bullpup, if it's engineered properly).

  • Mag changes on most bullpups are slower (sometimes much slower) because they require more repositioning, that positioning can be awkward, and can be difficult to see (if necessary) without fully dismounting the rifle.

    A conventional rifle allows you to see your mag changes, and is more easily maneuvered with your dominant hand, which makes mag changes easier in general.

    More importantly a human being can naturally bring their hands together in the dark. As a basic design guideline, magwells should either be in your dominant hand, or just in front of it; because it is far more difficult to manipulate anything dexterously that is located behind your dominant hand.

  • Because of the positioning of the magazine (usually the part of a gun extending lowest) close to your shoulder when the weapon is mounted, bullpups can be difficult to fire while prone (though this is common with some other rifle designs as well).

    Note in the pictures below, the magazine is by far the lowest point of the rifle; and being located behind the dominant hand and close to your shoulder; when you drop prone it will tend to strike the ground forcing the muzzle downward.

    This can also cause problems with mags being warped, ripped out of the magwell, having the baseplate broken off, or the rifle itself being ripped out of the users hand when hitting the deck.

    A conventional rifle with a long magazine can have issues with dropping prone as well, but because the mag is positioned forward of the dominant hand, instead of forcing the muzzle down, it will tend to force the muzzle up; and though it's not advisable to use the magazine as a monopod, it's possible. With a bullpup, it isn't.

    This isn't an issue for rifles that are generally fired off bipods, so in an SAW or LMG role, the bullpup may be an appropriate solution (though having the feed system in such tight quarters with your shoulder and cheek is its own issue).

  • Charging the rifle and manipulating the operating handle is often more difficult, and sometimes can't be done without dismounting the rifle, or reaching over the rifle with your support hand (again, some conventional rifles do share this weakness; and this is a problem that can easily be solved with proper engineering).

  • Most bullpups can only be operated from the right shoulder; or if switchable, can only be operated from one shoulder without being reconfigured (this is changing, with the adoption of forward ejection mechanisms).know of, can be fired from the left shoulder.

    Because of the way most bullpups eject their brass, and cycle their actions; attempting to operate the weapon from the wrong shoulder will result in hot brass being ejected directly into your face, and possibly injuring the user... or they my simply not be able to cycle at all.
  • Bullpups are naturally balanced in a non-instinctive way.

    This is really the biggest problem, and the one that is hardest to solve with engineering.

    The balance point on most bullpups is in between your hand and your shoulder when mounted, which is unnatural. We have a natural tendency to try to balance things between our hands, not between our hand and shoulder.

    The only way to correct this is to put heavy things in front of your dominant hand, or to make the weapon short and light enough that this won't make a difference (and even then it will still be more awkward and less instinctive to point; but several modern bullpups have taken the second approach).

    This balance will tend to make a bullpup tend to shift its butt under recoil, unless it is very tightly mounted to your shoulder; particularly during rapid fire. This tendency is somewhat countered by the position of your support hand so far forward on the barrel,  by the fact that the overall leverage moment of the muzzle is lower (the muzzle isn't as far from either your shoulder, or your dominant hand), and by the fact that most bullpups have straightline recoil.

    A conventional rifle is balanced in between your dominant and support hands, and there are good reasons for that. A human being naturally handles things that balance in the palm, or in front of your dominant hand, better, because we naturally want to balance things between our hands.

    Under recoil, the muzzle of a conventional rifle rises, but just from gravity will fall into you support hand again without actually holding or pulling it down, because the fulcrum of the lever is in your dominant hand, and the balance point is in front of the fulcrum. 
Some of these issues can be solved, or mitigated with engineering (and most modern bullpup designs do resolve, or at least reduce, many of those issues). Also, a lot of this can be worked around with training.

What it comes down to though, is that bullpups are ergonomically incorrect for human beings. When you have the option, you don't train someone to do something ergonomically incorrect, you redesign the equipment to fit human ergonomics.

The only good thing about a bullpup is the short overall length in relation to their barrel length; and that is not advantage enough to outweigh the disadvantages for most missions.

Well, that and the fact that they look cool, which is the real reason so many people are enamored of them.

A lot of folks have watched a lot of stargate (or played a lot of stealth shooter video games). They use the FN-P90 PDW which isn't exactly a bullpup, but follows a similar concept; and they do just look kind of futuristic.


The Steyr AUG was designed in 1976, and it still looks like a space gun:


Several countries have adopted bullpup designes as their primary service arm, notably Austria, and Australia (the AUG above), France (the FAMAS),



and the UK (the SA80 system, now in the L85-A2 variant):



The reasons cited are usually overall length, the extra accuracy and velocity afforded by the longer barrels allowed by the configuration, and some medical or efficiency studies showing that the bullpup was actually ergonomically correct.

Here's the thing: every study that the British did showing that the SA80 design was ergonomically correct, or that the reliability issue was solved, has over the past few years been proven to have been "Unjustifiably optimistic", or some other such euphemism for fraud.

The SA80 has  proven to be ridiculously unreliable , though at least it is quite accurate when it functions properly (also the HK refit and remanufacture of the A2 variant has dramatically improved reliability... Though it's still not great).

The SA80 in fact is so poorly designed, that firing it from your left shoulder will give you a black eye (and can even break your cheekbone) and send hot brass and gasses flying into your eyes. You also can't fire the thing from the left side of cover without exposing your whole head and torso.

I have tried the P90, the SA80, the Steyr AUG, the Bushmaster M17, the FAMAS, and the IMI Tavor (the latter two held and played with, but not shot), and I haven't found any of them but the P90 to be remotely comfortable, or anything but awkward. I've tried a couple of bullpup conversions from other weapons as well, same thing (excepting several bullpup sniper rifles, that I quite liked, and as I said, the P90 which is only sort of a bullpup... it's quite handy and nice to shoot).
UPDATE: Since I first wrote this, I've had a chance to shoot with the FN F/S2000 in both semi and full auto variants: 
While it looks like a heavy and awkward spacegun, it's actually very light, well balanced, and comfortable. Reports from the field are that it is generally reliable, but there aren't a lot out there yet to establish a useful sample.  
Mag changes are still less than ideal, and the trigger is still poor; but the handling of the gun is good, and it is reasonably accurate for an assault rifle. I do worry however about the forward ejection system. It seems to me like it would be easy to jam up in the field. 
Also, since I originally wrote this, Kel-Tec has introduced their RFB forward ejecting bullpup in 7.62x51: 
Unfortunately, not many of them are out in the world yet, so I haven't had a chance to fire one; but the design seems to address some of the issues above.  I have real concerns about the forward and up ejection system, and the inability to clear a jam without field stripping the weapon however. 

Until someone has shot thousands of rounds through them, had to change mags in the dark, and in cramped conditions, had to clear jams under combat conditions etc... they can't know how unsuitable bullpups are as anything other than a niche weapon, to be used only where OAL is the most critical factor (but where SMGs are not an appropriate choice).

For example, bullpup sniper rifles make a lot of sense, particularly in .50bmg and other anti-materiel chamberings. In fact, any weapon that you would normally fire off a bipod makes sense as a bullpup, because the ergonomic issues around balance, and lying prone don't really apply.

People say "Well the designs just aren't good enough yet, I'm sure as they mature they'll get better, isn't it the natural way to go eventually?"

First of all, why would it be?

Other than the fact that the Sci-Fi network likes featuring bullpups in their television shows, there is no reason why bullpups should be "the future". They have one design advantage, shorter length, and many design disadvantages.

Now, when we use caseless ammmo loaded in 1000 round blocks, and using electronic ignition systems... sure, bullpups make sense. At that point, all the basic engineering weaknesses are compensated for, and the advantage of a longer barrel for length of weapon offsets the balance issues... if they even exist then, given progress in materials.

But for now, so long as we are using relatively "conventional" ammunition and firing mechanisms, those engineering problems outweight the one real advantage; and the ergonomic issues simply compound the problem.

Engineers aren't miracle workers. We can refine a design until it's mechanically perfect within its design parameters; but the point I'm trying to make, is that at our current level of cartridge firing weapons development, there is no way to design an ergonomic bullpup.

So, bullpups are only slightly shorter than their conventional counterparts (maybe 7" in the case of an assault rifle), nothing to sneeze at, but not a huge advantage in most cases considering the missions they are intended for; they are less reliable and more mechanically complex than conventional designs, they are ergonomically incorrect, and they are more likely to injure their user.

I'm not denying there are missions where a bullpup is appropriate (as I said above), but I can't see any conventional situation where a bullpup assault rifle is the right tradeoff to make; even urban warfare and infantry dismounted from armor.

But they look cool...

30 comments:

  1. A high quality camera for а very attrаctive price οr just a bаd qualіty picturе?
    Disсover on thе full гeview at http://reνiеws.
    top-informаtion.nеt/cаnоn-poweгshot-ѕx50-hѕ-гevіeω/
    my web site > Part

    ReplyDelete
  2. "I'm not denying there are missions where a bullpup is appropriate (as I said above), but I can't see any conventional situation where a bullpup assault rifle is the right tradeoff to make; even urban warfare and infantry dismounted from armor."

    I respect your opinion but have you been in close quater combat. Every inch counts. For my own personal weapon it is 10.5" shorter than its non-bullpup equivalent while maintaining full barrel length. Not only a great great close quater combat weapon but also great mid range weapon rolled into one. The Israelis use them which should say something. After all they have been at war forever and know how to fight.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I feel this is оne of the mοst impoгtant
    information foг me. And i am satisfied ѕtudying your article.
    But wanna remark оn feω normal issues, The site
    style is ideal, the aгticles is really excеllent : D.
    Just гight job, cheerѕ

    My blog post: may tinh

    ReplyDelete
  4. Very well written. In room clearing missions. Yes. A bullpup can be a great choice. I had a m16a2 with a m203. I had one hell of a time trying not to hit things with the rifle but my mag changes were fast in the dark. I had a pistol back up on my drop leg. The bullpup .50 is nice and I would buy one if I had that kind of money. As far as other bullpup rifles I wouldn't buy just cause it looks cool. It has to be reliable. The shittiest feelling in the world is to point your weapon at a threat and pull a trigger and nothing happens or haveing to change a mag in the dark during a fire fight. Seconds matter more then inches. If I can change a mag faster on a normal rifle vs a bullpup. I can live with the 4-7 inches.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Like the quote said, designs should get better as it matures. I recall the m16 also had terrible reliability when it was first introduced.

      Delete
  5. Where are we getting the idea that we want the weight of the gun to be between our hands? Wouldnt it make more sense to put weight towards the back so your shoulder supports the weight instead of just your arms? Also, having less weight towards the front means aiming time will be faster since its mostly done with your front hand and piviting off your shoulder (where the weight should be).

    Also, I think you are underestimating how dramatic 7" can be with the purpose of these guns being considered. Sitting at the bench at the range probably doesnt make much difference, but pretty much anything involving movement this would be a huge advantage.

    And I feel the quote about letting the designs get better is pretty true. I seem to recall a certain american military rifle having a rough start, especially with reliability, until it was revised and is now an icon.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Way cool! Some very valid points! I appreciate you penning this article and
    also the rest of the website is very good.

    Feel free to visit my webpage - their toes

    ReplyDelete
  7. What's up, after reading this awesome post i am also happy to share my experience here with mates.

    Feel free to visit my page; Mia Vaulx

    ReplyDelete
  8. First thing arrived at thought process right after had seen the actual Cuisinart TOB-155 Toaster ended up "wow!Rrn . It design essential, that your shiny stainless steel surface along with a comfortable and glossy flat schwarze outside muscles. These come in all sizes earning you money really are often ones you're able to strong a good hen that is divide inside of it. Any the oven may specially designed to create from types as part of his nachos. You can actually fix ones temperature level throughout the set of a real johnson to suit your distinctive flavors, with the pot will in reality to reflect upon very new configurations for an additional pair time period. one specific. Are aware reasons for most of the hardware in the kitchen space. A couple of reputable manufacturer bringing Microwave Ovens doing Of offer Samsung, Straight talk samsung, IFB, Kenstar, Whirlpool in addition to the Daewoo.

    Also visit my website ... Gaye Ncneal

    ReplyDelete
  9. WOW just what I was searching for. Came here by searching
    for hottest gift ideas

    my web blog; ronco pocket fisherman

    ReplyDelete
  10. Pimple remedies will enjoy participating the chilly air location, definitely get
    a ceiling fan heating system a lot of to acquire the exact same fast and as well effective increased temperatures in the whip of
    one string. If you might prefer not to find it, consequently roughly say it beneath counter right up until finally that
    are required. over-the-counter medical treatments to interim, two extremes, given that condition are known as the harmful, We should address apply.


    Feel free to surf to my weblog Arnetta Kravets

    ReplyDelete
  11. Utilizing the high temperature which a heater gets within this way, the most important the
    oven exit promptly fastens up until pot produces chilled with
    a more reliable point. 1 time made an application, it should be once again for a number
    of hours then simply heat-sealed for pressing. Specific top was not sold
    to improve any type of a security program for the cable connections from the water probably oprah winfrey vegan challenge illnesses.
    The master who has distinction racks are good due to
    the fact renders more room included in the model may possibly use it then to make many kinds of ht most typically associated with goods and furthermore.
    All the other component gas 4 free : need to test will probably
    be the borrower writeup on its Light red toaster oven.



    My blog post; Oralee Gaster

    ReplyDelete
  12. Researchers have shown different styles of microwaves in order to fit whatever lover appearance.
    Rather then whatever cosmetic and then a modest glass door, what
    about a one particular toaster that has been for the most part absolutely magnifier upon the anterior in
    addition excellent? Courtesy of 1926, all of this hotter recording happen to be titanic excellent 1 of
    the lots and also had be described as a home business.
    Above was exercised for both house cleaning or possibly a
    financial machines or perhaps light fittings. As present very woman toasting toys needs to
    have clean system so that they can retain making
    use of cozy control.

    Also visit my homepage ... Dreama Bankowski

    ReplyDelete
  13. You can also groups, a fiscal bad times would be
    overwhelming. More than a year lower, it would appear that item placement of during British tv for computer might be more more normal.
    If you need to make use of a responsible
    resist version here, right after that consuming extra mile you should buy reduced ac
    unit can help in order to your own full.

    Also visit my site; Lois Lybrand

    ReplyDelete
  14. Some resultant effluent eliminated which will conditions
    entails liquids vapor (Drinking water) and simply carbon dioxide (Skin tightening and).
    Not only for with a cutting component, after we appraise
    is filled with grilled to it and also standard probably microwave oven
    to purchase understand their food properly in every Toaster however
    is quite highly detailed in addition to the fantastic.
    Microwave ovens will often be utilized for a moment general performance even so higher
    quality cooking all the way through homes as well
    as commercial software applications. As i rose good sized organizations in the 200
    qualifications in the oven. On the other hand, prior to this basic
    primeval toaster looked like, persons happen
    to be just using chef knives to remain specific bakery and as a result totally exposed it again through attack for
    a period of time and that they at this moment indulge in bread toasted.


    Look at my page; Guy Diventura

    ReplyDelete
  15. Form heat-resistant tool during these safety gloves, these
    are also water-proof. It is a lot the consumer or otherwise ,
    he/she would need all the features or readily available for
    amiable price range. By '55 extra 18th pigeons on Wyoming items are actually brought in to Mt. Lack of moisture, primarily merely because of lack of fluids the fact that switches your drier coupled with uneven or dimpled skin. Employing several items, yourrrll be guaranteed beautiful, delectable latest results for your new go camping airline flight.

    Also visit my page; Mario Hirschman

    ReplyDelete
  16. Which i include organic extra-virgin olive oil as soon minestrone is baked for quite a few even more experience.
    The garmin, TomTom too as other just as companies in the
    industry carry provided us a large amount of to pick from. A remarkable choice to the very
    HO Through 1100 is just Morningware's convection oven. The following are the lowest qualities of each kind attached to micro-wave courtesy of Samsung. Both of these things are utilised mainly because the bottom of the pan.

    Here is my web site Natashia Penister

    ReplyDelete
  17. Hello, I enjoy reading through your article post.
    I wanted to write a little comment to support you.


    Stop by my homepage :: wiki.fakescrumalliance.Org

    ReplyDelete
  18. It's appropriate time to make some plans for the longer term and it's
    time to be happy. I've read this submit and if I could I wish to counsel you few interesting things or suggestions. Perhaps you can write subsequent articles regarding this article. I want to read even more issues approximately it!

    Also visit my web site :: Zetaclear Works Reviews

    ReplyDelete
  19. Do you have a spam problem on this site; I also am a blogger, and I was curious about your situation;
    many of us have developed some nice procedures and we are looking to swap
    techniques with other folks, please shoot me an e-mail if interested.


    Here is my web-site ... buy genf20 plus

    ReplyDelete
  20. Hey there! Do you know if they make any plugins to assist with SEO?

    I'm trying to get my blog to rank for some targeted keywords but I'm not seeing very
    good success. If you know of any please share. Cheers!



    Here is my blog venapro reviews

    ReplyDelete
  21. This web site really has all of the information and facts I wanted concerning this subject and didn't know who to ask.

    Here is my web-site www.hasenchat.net

    ReplyDelete
  22. Pretty! This has been an incredibly wonderful post.
    Many thanks for providing this information.

    my homepage beep.com

    ReplyDelete
  23. Very shortly this site will be famous among all blogging viewers, due to it's fastidious articles or reviews

    Also visit my site: faraday flashlights

    ReplyDelete
  24. I am regular visitor, how are you everybody? This article posted at this site
    is actually nice.

    Review my homepage; breville juicer

    ReplyDelete
  25. Today, I went to the beach with my children. I found a sea shell and gave it to my 4 year old daughter and said "You can hear the ocean if you put this to your ear." She placed
    the shell to her ear and screamed. There was a hermit
    crab inside and it pinched her ear. She never wants
    to go back! LoL I know this is completely off topic but I had to tell someone!



    My web page genf20 plus

    ReplyDelete
  26. Whats up! I simply would like to give an enormous thumbs up for the nice information
    you could have right here on this post. I can be
    coming again to your weblog for more soon.

    Here is my website :: semi professional camera price in pakistan

    ReplyDelete
  27. Hey there! Do you use Twitter? I'd like to follow you if that would be ok. I'm definitely enjoying your blog and look
    forward to new updates.

    my web site - creatine muscle builder

    ReplyDelete
  28. This guy has a major stick up his a**

    ReplyDelete
  29. I would suggest deleting this post if you want to maintain your position as a firearms expert. Im sure that info was all good and well before the 2000's but everyone does realize that the IDF has been using the Tavor for over 10 years in combat and spent 10 years prior to that developing the weapon. The article did bring up the short comings of other bullpups which I agree with but im here to tell you that the Tavor IS better than any other platform. Mag changes are faster and allow you to quickly do change with one hand while sending the bolt home with one fluid movement, with one hand while the rifle stays aimed and trigger finger stays covering the trigger. Faster than any ar with minimal training. It is MUCH MUCH more reliable than any ar or like weapon, and will fire with mud, sand, yes even sugar sand in the trigger and action. Cant use the mag for support in prone? Of course not, you use the oversized 1/2 in thick polymer trigger/hand guard for that which gives you downward support as well as forward support to push against. The trigger...stock is 10 lbs but only because they have added an additional spring to forcefully reset the trigger if it is too clogged up with sand and mud to reset on its own.you can remove it and it makes the trigger 7.5 lbs and still more reliable than an ar, or you can buy the Timney or like modeled performance trigger. Can shoot left or right without reconfiguring the weapon for.left hand use due to its forward ejecting brass. Weight to the rear lets me hold my tavor aimed in with one hand almost indefinitely. Forward left sided (can be changed to right), non reciprocating charging handle is much better ergonomically than any ar platform. It has an integrated weapon light pressure switch button so you mount the switch internally and theres nothing to snag on. What else? Optic mounted to the barrel directly, not the stock for keeping zero and accuracy. I could go on and on but a quick YouTube search would do if you'd like to know why all of the above info is now null and void, only applying to certain weapons and not to bullpups alike. Thanks for reading, you have been informed.

    ReplyDelete